tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post1086387726678411211..comments2024-03-24T17:13:53.855-07:00Comments on TenFourFox Development: 5b2 delayed, sorryClassicHasClasshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-36679899639030490742011-06-16T15:45:01.587-07:002011-06-16T15:45:01.587-07:00Bob, you haven't upgraded to beta 2 yet, have ...Bob, you haven't upgraded to beta 2 yet, have you? ;) This was fixed (see subsequent blog postings).<br /><br />However, I'd advise you wait until the weekend, because 5 RC is going to be out shortly.ClassicHasClasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-12073603529268768182011-06-16T15:43:04.153-07:002011-06-16T15:43:04.153-07:00I'm not sure of the proper protocol for report...I'm not sure of the proper protocol for reporting a bug, but I've been using TenFourFox 5.0b1 for several weeks now, and I have repeatedly encountered an issue with the display of fill-in forms. "Tick-boxes" fail to display, making it impossible to complete the form by indicating the box with a mouse click.<br /><br />Unfortunately, I can't supply example page URLs because the pages are usually called within secure sessions that would be inaccessible to anyone lacking the proper credentials to reach the secure site.<br /><br />If I continue to see the issue, I can attempt to do screen captures of the pages displayed by TenFourFox without the tick boxes visible, and the same page as displayed by Safari, with the tick boxes visible and operational.<br /><br />This appears to be an issue with the new code, as I was able to use the tick boxes on these pages with no issue when using the previous version of TenFourFox.Bob in Torontohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00620443937656554897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-63935660164852941782011-06-10T02:57:40.608-07:002011-06-10T02:57:40.608-07:00Here's the FreeBSD one I found: http://fxr.wat...Here's the FreeBSD one I found: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/gen/posix_spawn.c?v=FREEBSD-LIBCJonas Maebehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02458193496621283799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-58486422481009161902011-06-08T05:33:21.860-07:002011-06-08T05:33:21.860-07:00We have a basic skeletal generic POSIX one in issu...We have a basic skeletal generic POSIX one in issue 66. However, if the FreeBSD userland library is faster (do you have a URL?), we might use that instead. However, I'm not going to implement this until it's absolutely necessary, which will probably be around the time content processes reach beta.ClassicHasClasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-72734876621632840752011-06-08T01:23:17.597-07:002011-06-08T01:23:17.597-07:00About the lack of posix_spawn in 10.4: FreeBSD has...About the lack of posix_spawn in 10.4: FreeBSD has a user space implementation of posix_spawn. It may of course still depend on other kernel-level functionality that 10.4 doesn't have, I haven't looked at it in detail. And there's still the fact that the plugins themselves won't be updated anymore, as you've mentioned before.Jonas Maebehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02458193496621283799noreply@blogger.com