tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post7897029383744622444..comments2024-03-24T17:13:53.855-07:00Comments on TenFourFox Development: 9.0 now releaseClassicHasClasshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-1516941884295494352011-12-25T09:10:18.803-08:002011-12-25T09:10:18.803-08:00My Tenfourfox 9 experiences with Tracejit+Methodji...My Tenfourfox 9 experiences with Tracejit+Methodjit after one week:<br /><br />After much "pounding" as requested by Cameron, I was only able to find one script that doesn't work well with MJ (issue 119). This can easily be blocked with Adblock or Noscript for the time being. I found no crash bugs (only one single crash so far, but non-reproducible). The browser hasn't crashed at all during the last six days (with both TJ and MJ enabled), even though I was kicking it pretty mercilessly. This is much better than I had expected.<br /><br />To be honest: I don't think that JS benchmarks like Sunspider or Kraken are anywhere near realistic. Here, their results are even contrary to each other: Sunspider shows MJ clearly ahead of TJ (and the combination of both even better), whereas TJ is twice as fast as MJ in Kraken (see my test results in "9.0 RC available with secret sauce"). I can only suspect that they're testing different things, and that none of them gets the mixture quite right of what's really on the web.<br /><br />The best (in my opinion) "reality test", Peacekeeper, shows no difference between TJ and TJ+MJ, and with MJ alone (and without type inference) it's only slightly slower. This pretty much reflects my browsing experience: Facebook's new Timeline is a good speed test, and I don't notice much of a difference in loading and scrolling no matter what jit configuration I use. The same goes for the Amazon start page and other complicated websites. <br /><br />Now on to some more glogg. Merry Christmas!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-11420808612252484792011-12-21T05:51:41.007-08:002011-12-21T05:51:41.007-08:00German langpack installer for TFF 9.0:
http://code...German langpack installer for TFF 9.0:<br />http://code.google.com/p/tenfourfox/issues/detail?id=61#c86Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-13399985754378617242011-12-20T15:39:46.278-08:002011-12-20T15:39:46.278-08:00@art, 15-30% everywhere indicates a serious proble...@art, 15-30% everywhere indicates a serious problem and one I can't replicate. If you're really observing that, I probably can't fix it.<br /><br />@zubr, yes. However, we are slaves to Mozilla's version numbering as long as we are at source parity with rapid release, so we need to plan as if the next release in 9 would be 9.0.1.ClassicHasClasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-30631262116526482872011-12-20T11:45:33.969-08:002011-12-20T11:45:33.969-08:009.1 would be a better version number.9.1 would be a better version number.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-57682658354183051232011-12-20T10:11:14.472-08:002011-12-20T10:11:14.472-08:00Have noticed an overall 15-30% reduction in speed ...Have noticed an overall 15-30% reduction in speed with methodjit enabled. On two occasions, new tabs opened, but the actual tab didn't appear for over a minute. <br /><br />http://www.mademan.com (which works fine under tracejit) became very slow, with constant unresponsive-script warnings, and went from taking a few seconds to load to a few minutes. Also the ajax-autocomplete in the search bar completely quit working. Returned to normal when methodjit was disabled.<br /><br />Tested on Digital Audio Dual-533, 1GB RAM, OSX 10.4.11.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-19555545780944675462011-12-20T03:24:06.791-08:002011-12-20T03:24:06.791-08:00Thank you very much. You have faster released than...Thank you very much. You have faster released than Mozilla (Firefox 9.0) :D<br /><br />It works on my Mac Mini G4 with 10.5.8 Leopard. And it runs on my Power Mac G5 with 10.5.8 Leopard and 10.4.11 Tiger. <br /><br />And it works on 10.5.8 Intel and 10.6.8 Intel with Rosetta, too.<br /><br />On my 10.3.9 Panther runs Classilla 9.2.3 :)Christian Zigotzkyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01226996382741567987noreply@blogger.com