tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post2787055025673349416..comments2024-03-24T17:13:53.855-07:00Comments on TenFourFox Development: 13.0.1 not plannedClassicHasClasshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-9533835057558528832012-06-25T13:47:54.203-07:002012-06-25T13:47:54.203-07:00This concerns us, too: Newtab screenshots may reve...This concerns us, too: Newtab screenshots may reveal secure info from https sites:<br />http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Security-concerns-over-Firefox-s-new-tab-thumbnail-feature-1625761.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-77819855950108995052012-06-17T10:42:14.675-07:002012-06-17T10:42:14.675-07:00While I was initially on the same page, I must dis...While I was initially on the same page, I must disagree. Click-to-play is still very rudimentary in 14 (breaks VDH, one click activates every Flash instance, etc.). It stands to reason that they will improve upon it in future versions but Tobias was completely correct to leave it disabled in 14.commenterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07519524577344612730noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-79687948930445563872012-06-17T09:27:07.288-07:002012-06-17T09:27:07.288-07:00It will be; I just have to see how it behaves in t...It will be; I just have to see how it behaves in the default. If it shows "click to play" icons when plugins are already off, that would just be annoying, so I may connect the two prefs together.ClassicHasClasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-68233156928445640122012-06-17T08:53:33.398-07:002012-06-17T08:53:33.398-07:00You should still enable click-to-play by default f...You should still enable click-to-play by default for those fools who enable plugins.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-45532700996826050362012-06-16T12:00:16.601-07:002012-06-16T12:00:16.601-07:00And as it is a spinoff, debaters should remember t...And as it is a spinoff, debaters should remember that using AuroraFox is in fact using TenFourFox as well.commenterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07519524577344612730noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-9328781390509580272012-06-14T06:17:51.446-07:002012-06-14T06:17:51.446-07:00I should also add I don't have any plans curre...I should also add I don't have any plans currently to move porting work to Aurora, mostly because that branch still has too much churn for my tastes. So if you want to try an Aurora build and get closer to that "Firefox nightly feel," and have 10.5, then use AuroraFox. Some of the observations from AuroraFox in turn are used when the beta port starts for our unstable branch, so there is cross-pollination.ClassicHasClasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-82363311622416227002012-06-14T06:13:35.267-07:002012-06-14T06:13:35.267-07:00What Chris said. I don't have anything officia...What Chris said. I don't have anything official personally to do with AuroraFox, primarily because it requires 10.5 and I require Classic, but it does originate from our community (Tobias Netzel and commenter/spmjns are the primary part of that work) and uses TenFourFox code as part of its foundation. It is based on Mozilla Aurora, and therefore the executable is also called Aurora.<br /><br />You can think of it like Tenfourbird; it too uses TenFourFox foundations, but adds additional new code for the Thunderbird component.<br /><br />There are probably other smaller spinoffs we haven't heard about yet.ClassicHasClasshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17331846076856918359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-72142300302975069112012-06-14T00:51:37.282-07:002012-06-14T00:51:37.282-07:00Aurorafox is the PPC version of the Intel Mac Auro...Aurorafox is the PPC version of the Intel Mac Aurora. The PPC version is made possible with the technology and experience gained from the TenFourFox project. It's G4/G5 and 10.5 only.<br /><br />Aurora is Mozilla's "alpha" (unstable, maybe not yet feature complete) version of the next Firefox. It's actally not meant for a large audience, it's for testing purposes. Mozilla has a tradition to name Firefox alpha versions differently (Dear Park, Minefield etc.), and with the new rapid release cycle the browser is called Aurora.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1015214236289077798.post-61709649254007293922012-06-13T21:38:04.524-07:002012-06-13T21:38:04.524-07:00I'd like to understand the relationship betwee...I'd like to understand the relationship between TenFourFox and AuroraFox, which I recently found via this post: http://macpowerpc.com/2012/06/11/aurora-the-next-generation-for-mac-powerpc/<br /><br />I read that it's supposed to combine innovations from TenFourFox and others? I'm also puzzled that the post (and the browser I downloaded from the link) are called Aurora, not AuroraFox.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02999524983802282586noreply@blogger.com